POLS 642 Intermediate Analysis of Political Data
in groups, check out this APSR article; read only the abstract and intro
what’s the research question? what’s the hypothesis?
what are the IV and DV? how are they measured?
what are the research methods?
what challenges is the author trying to overcome by using these methods?
Inference in the process of trying to use facts we know learn facts we don’t know
Bailey describes two fundamental challenges to inference:
the problem of randomness: how do we know if patterns in our sample are true in the broader population
the problem of causality: when can we be confident that a relationship between two variables is due to one causing the other?
This course focuses on both, maybe more on the former?
The challenges of randomness and causality are not unique to quantitative research
They are not the only things we should be thinking about in assessing “good” research
What makes for “good” research?
“The best advice I received in the discipline was that it is better to take B+ swings at A+ questions than A+ swings at B+ questions.”

it can help spot trends and puzzles
it can put a specific case in context
it can assess the generalizability of a pattern
it can adjudicate between competing explanations
it opens up specific toolkits (surveys, experiments)
it’s a tool in service of a bigger goal
“our focus will be on causal inference”
“underlying everything we are doing is the concept of causality”

it’s a tool to help make working with data easier (ha!)
the replicability advantage
the ability to manipulate data
graphical representation
FREE!
Today: Intro and Syllabus
Thursday: Data Viz, Tidyverse, and GGPLOT
Friday: Data Camp Due
Next Week: Describing Single Variables
Backup: OneDrive, DropBox, Google Drive, iCloud
Citations: Zotero, Mendeley, EndNote
Statistical Analysis: R with RStudio IDE
Editor: MS Word, Quarto in R Studio, LaTex (?)
I am going to turn to the actual syllabus document now…